Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only?
Date
Msg-id 46A4C63F.8070604@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why is lc_messages superuser only?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Looking around the lc_messages stuff a bit, I notice it's set to
> superuser-only. 
>
> I do use
> ALTER USER joe SET lc_messages='sv_SE'
>
> now and then to change the language for a user. And I see it's also
> possible to use it on a database level by doing
> ALTER DATABASE postgres SET lc_messages='sv_SE'
>
> (user overriding database overriding system default, as expected)
>
> However, it can also be useful for the user to be able to change his own
> session, and this only works if you are superuser.
>
> Is there a reason for this?
>
>
>   

Presumably we don't want a user changing what is used on the logs ...

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: syslogging oddity
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only?