Re: syslogging oddity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: syslogging oddity
Date
Msg-id 25524.1185203690@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: syslogging oddity  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it won't normally. Still, I think 
> we could live with that. I'm not inclined to waste too much time on it.

Yeah.  I think the only reason it was LOG initially was because the
syslogger was pretty experimental at the time.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only?