Re: SSPI vs MingW - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SSPI vs MingW
Date
Msg-id 24327.1185201258@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSPI vs MingW  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> 1) Simply state that SSPI authentication in the backend cannot be built
>> with mingw, and require msvc build for it (the msvc api follows the windows
>> api, which is hardly surprising). We could add an autoconf test for it
>> that'd pick up an updated libsecur32.a file if/when mingw release an
>> update.

> I prefer this option,

+1.  I grow weary of working around so many Windows-related bugs/omissions.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Oops in fe-auth.c
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Oops in fe-auth.c