Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0707230934y629a2aeerdae4315cb3424947@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 7/23/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:


Certainly it doesn't prevent starvation completely -- really there is no
way to completely prevent starvation unless you have as many workers as
you have tables, and one disk for each.  What DSM does do is let the big
tables be vacuumed quickly which makes most of the problem go away.



Frankly I haven't seen DSM results very closely, but DSM can help
us avoid full heap scans (and thats a big thing!), but it  can't avoid the
associated index scans and that might limit our ability to vacuum very
large tables frequently.

Thanks,
Pavan


--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32