Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

26 June 2006

• 00:02   Re: Table clustering idea Luke Lonergan
• 00:06   Re: Table clustering idea Josh Berkus
• 01:29   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck
• 02:13   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 05:17   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck
• 05:49   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 12:17   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:33   Re: vacuum row? Csaba Nagy
• 12:36   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 12:36   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 12:37   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 12:43   Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:47   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 12:50   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 12:52   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 12:58   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:59   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 13:08   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page
• 13:10   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bruce Momjian
• 13:11   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 13:18   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 13:19   Re: vacuum row? Mark Woodward
• 13:37   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 13:57   Re: vacuum row? A.M.
• 14:03   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Devrim GUNDUZ
• 14:04   Re: vacuum row? Jonah H. Harris
• 14:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 14:33   ERROR: invalid page header in block Alexandru Coseru
• 14:36   "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Oswaldo Hernández
• 14:49   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:50   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 14:57   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:06   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 15:08   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Robert Treat
• 15:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 15:29   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Bort, Paul
• 15:29   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page
• 15:41   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression PFC
• 15:45   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression Bruce Momjian
• 15:47   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page
• 15:53   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression PFC
• 16:06   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 19:42   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:42   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:43   Re: ERROR: invalid page header in block Simon Riggs
• 19:43   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 19:43   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby
• 19:43   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs
• 19:43   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 19:44   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Josh Berkus
• 19:45   Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables Greg Stark
• 19:45   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby
• 19:46   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   GIN index creation extremely slow ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 19:46   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 19:47   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs
• 19:47   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:52   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 19:57   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) Bruce Momjian
• 20:00   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Simon Riggs
• 20:28   Re: Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables elein
• 20:43   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 20:50   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) Tom Lane
• 20:54   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:59   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs
• 21:04   Re: Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables Greg Stark
• 21:08   Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane
• 21:26   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 21:49   Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? Oleg Bartunov
• 22:00   Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Simon Riggs