Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
Date
Msg-id 200606261107.55341.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 26 June 2006 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: 24 June 2006 20:50
> > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Tom Lane; Dave Page
> > Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re:
> > [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL
> >
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > wasn't someone just trying to donate a machine to us for the
> > website but we
> > weren't sure what to do with it?  One that could do VM's?
> > Seems we could use
> > that for some buildfarm members maybe.
>
> As with most of these, the two I was discussing recently fell through
> (usual problem, company making the offer seems to think we run the
> entire project off one ancient server, and therefore think that the
> celeron box they offer will entitle them to be listed as hosts of the
> entire project).
>

Right, but I am thinking that maybe we should ask these guys if they can offer 
boxes for the buildfarm, which could run from a celeron box.  

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC