Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388B52@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: 24 June 2006 20:50
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Tom Lane; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re:
> [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL
>
>
> Dave,
>
> wasn't someone just trying to donate a machine to us for the
> website but we
> weren't sure what to do with it?  One that could do VM's?
> Seems we could use
> that for some buildfarm members maybe.

As with most of these, the two I was discussing recently fell through
(usual problem, company making the offer seems to think we run the
entire project off one ancient server, and therefore think that the
celeron box they offer will entitle them to be listed as hosts of the
entire project).

Devrim was working with another potential contributor though, dunno how
that's going.

Regards, Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Woodward"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions