Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

7 March 2001

• 01:05   Re[2]: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB? Xu Yifeng
• 01:15   Re[2]: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:24   Re: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB? Thomas Lockhart
• 01:33   Re: Re[2]: [SQL] Re: why the DB file size does not reduce when 'delete'the data in DB? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:37   RE: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:37   RE: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:16   Re: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 03:23   output from EXPLAIN VERBOSE Michal Maru¹ka
• 03:58   I'm back Vadim Mikheev
• 05:45   Re: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:45   Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ... Vadim Mikheev
• 06:10   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:10   AW: Proposed WAL changes Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:31   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Vadim Mikheev
• 06:46   AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is ins ecur e Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:07   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecur e Vadim Mikheev
• 07:10   AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is ins ecur e Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:01   Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster Vadim Mikheev
• 08:01   Re: Proposed WAL changes Vadim Mikheev
• 08:07   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecur e Vadim Mikheev
• 08:25   AW: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmast er Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:32   Re: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Vadim Mikheev
• 08:40   Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster Andrew McMillan
• 08:57   Re: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Vadim Mikheev
• 09:29   Re: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Vadim Mikheev
• 09:47   Re: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Vadim Mikheev
• 09:59   AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:16   CeBit Michael Meskes
• 10:44   Re: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Vadim Mikheev
• 10:47   WAL & SHM principles Martin Devera
• 11:27   AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:51   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Bruce Momjian
• 13:00   Re: WAL & SHM principles Bruce Momjian
• 13:17   Re: Query Planning time increased 3 times on 7.1 compared to 7.0.3 Christof Petig
• 13:30   Re: Contributions? Olivier PRENANT
• 13:38   Re: psql missing feature Peter Eisentraut
• 13:41   Re: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: Contributions? Karel Zak
• 13:54   Re: WAL & SHM principles Martin Devera
• 13:55   Re: Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ... Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is ins ecur e Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: psql missing feature Michal Maru¹ka
• 14:22   Re: WAL & SHM principles Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: WAL & SHM principles Bruce Momjian
• 14:55   Re: Proposed WAL changes Peter Eisentraut
• 14:59   Re: Proposed WAL changes The Hermit Hacker
• 15:38   Re: Proposed WAL changes Ian Lance Taylor
• 16:28   pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a kovacsz
• 16:39   Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: Performance monitor The Hermit Hacker
• 17:50   RE: AW: Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:05   RE: Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:09   RE: Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:56   Re: pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a Oliver Elphick
• 19:04   RE: Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:05   RE: Proposed WAL changes Alex Pilosov
• 19:10   Re: Proposed WAL changes ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:21   Re: WAL & SHM principles ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:27   RE: WAL & SHM principles Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:41   Re: Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
• 19:42   Re: Performance monitor Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: Proposed WAL changes ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:16   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 20:39   Re: Performance monitor Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
• 21:12   Re: pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a Philip Warner
• 21:17   Re: Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
• 21:21   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:26   Re: pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a Oliver Elphick
• 21:59   Re: Performance monitor Philip Warner
• 22:00   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: Proposed WAL changes Ian Lance Taylor
• 22:36   Re: Performance monitor Justin Clift
• 22:43   Re: Performance monitor Philip Warner
• 22:47   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:59   pg_dump error Luis Magaña
• 23:00   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
• 23:08   RE: Performance monitor Mike Mascari
• 23:27   RE: Performance monitor Philip Warner
• 23:46   Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:49   RE: Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim