Re: Proposed WAL changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposed WAL changes
Date
Msg-id 9448.983979377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed WAL changes  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Proposed WAL changes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ?

In general, yes.  I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option,
you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint
subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread
postgresql.conf anyway.  Peter, is that correct?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql missing feature
Next
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: Contributions?