Re: Proposed WAL changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Proposed WAL changes
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103071755120.986-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed WAL changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ?
>
> In general, yes.  I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option,
> you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint
> subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread
> postgresql.conf anyway.  Peter, is that correct?

Nope.  The configuration file is only read at postmaster start and after
SIGHUP.  If any starting backend would read it automatically, the admin
could never be sure about his edits.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL & SHM principles
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed WAL changes