Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

25 June 2001

• 03:03   Re[6]: Postgres is too slow? Paul
• 05:12   to_timestamp busted? Eliel Mamousette
• 07:25   Re: to_timestamp busted? Karel Zak
• 07:30   Re: to_timestamp busted? Eric G. Miller
• 07:54   RE: to_timestamp busted? Eliel Mamousette
• 08:33   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Daniel Åkerud
• 11:41   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Jan Wieck
• 12:45   RH announcement is there Jan Wieck
• 13:24   What's it: NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry Vitaliy V. Romanets
• 13:32   Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   forms and reports Oliver Vecernik
• 13:55   More Red Hat information Bruce Momjian
• 13:57   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Daniel Åkerud
• 13:59   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Brent R. Matzelle
• 14:15   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Daniel Åkerud
• 14:17   Re: What's it: NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry Bruce Momjian
• 14:20   Re: forms and reports James Thompson
• 14:36   Re: Bug list? Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 14:37   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 14:45   Re: What's it: NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry Peter Eisentraut
• 14:49   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 14:52   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Mitch Vincent
• 15:03   Re: More Red Hat information David Wheeler
• 15:11   MySQL comparison Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Stephan Szabo
• 15:23   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 15:35   Re: More Red Hat information Gunnar Rønning
• 15:41   Re: strange behavior using foreign keys Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 15:56   Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis Daniel Åkerud
• 15:57   Re: More Red Hat information webb sprague
• 15:59   Re: MySQL comparison Daniel Åkerud
• 16:14   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 16:14   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Justin Clift
• 16:20   Storage limits in PostgreSQL? Frank Hilliard
• 16:26   INNER JOIN ON vs ','+WHERE Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 16:28   Re: More Red Hat information Vince Vielhaber
• 16:38   Re: Storage limits in PostgreSQL? wsheldah@lexmark.com
• 16:43   Re: Storage limits in PostgreSQL? Mitch Vincent
• 16:45   Re: More Red Hat information Gregory Wood
• 16:53   Re: INNER JOIN ON vs ','+WHERE Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 17:02   Re: Storage limits in PostgreSQL? Lamar Owen
• 17:09   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 17:26   It's Apache, not PostgreSQL Frank Hilliard
• 17:33   Re: MySQL comparison Mike Mascari
• 17:35   Re: INNER JOIN ON vs ','+WHERE Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 17:40   Re: INNER JOIN ON vs ','+WHERE Tom Lane
• 17:52   PostgreSQL: YMMV? Jan Ploski
• 17:53   Re: More Red Hat information Bruce Momjian
• 18:12   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 18:19   Re: More Red Hat information Vince Vielhaber
• 18:24   Re: More Red Hat information Bruce Momjian
• 18:31   Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL Bryan White
• 18:35   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:40   Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL wsheldah@lexmark.com
• 18:51   Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 18:53   Pg uses non-unique index instead of pkey index Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 19:09   RE: PostgreSQL: YMMV? Dave Cramer
• 19:42   RE: PostgreSQL: YMMV? Jan Ploski
• 20:41   Re: Pg uses non-unique index instead of pkey index Tom Lane
• 22:40   pgsql 7.1.2 server hanging... Ed Loehr
• 22:41   Confused about SHMMAX Sanjay Bhatia
• 22:48   RE: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Andrew Snow
• 23:01   Re: Confused about SHMMAX Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
• 23:21   RE: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos