Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 3B3769F6.5E967A49@postgresql.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL ("Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" <thalis@cs.pitt.edu>) |
List | pgsql-general |
Hi all, My thought on this is that Red Hat will do the following : a) Gain entry into a profitable, growing market segment with their product b) Enhance PostgreSQL's profile through their work c) Assist in more people developing with and for PostgreSQL, both through Red Hat's people and through others adding support for "Red Hat Database" to their products c.a) More bugs fixed c.b) More features added c.c) Further improved documentation c.d) Improve the present database design, management and development tools. Sybase, Oracle, Informix benefit from them. We will too. At some point they'll probably provide some direction into the PostgreSQL effort too. Nothing wrong with this as long as it's to the benefit of PostgreSQL users (not just "Red Hat Database" users) and generally acceptable. I think their input should be encouraged, just not taken verbatim. So, I reckon it's a great thing to have more people involved with PostgreSQL. The PostgreSQL community is strong, and should not be scared of this. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > --- Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > > > > Here is a press release stating Red Hat will offer commercial > > > > support > > > > for PostgreSQL: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_database.html > > > > > > Is RedHat simply providing PostgreSQL support or are they > > > placing developers to work on enhancements/bug fixes as well? > > > > They are placing developers too. New people. I assume they will > > announce something here today. > > Yes, but are they going to be collaborating closely with the current Pg core devel team or are they going to work on theirown? The concern is regarding the Cnet article about "Redhat forking off eventually with their own pg". Their representativesaid that there is not such intention but given that "verba volant, scripta manent", what are the guaranteesagainst that? > > It would really spoil my day to have GM'ed Postgresqls running around. I can barely keep up with one, let alone two ;-) > > cheers, > thalis > > > > > -- > > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
pgsql-general by date: