Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From wsheldah@lexmark.com
Subject Re: It's Apache, not PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200106251940.PAA01112@interlock2.lexmark.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to It's Apache, not PostgreSQL  (Frank Hilliard <frankhilliard@home.com>)
List pgsql-general

That limit can also be raised by changing a constant and recompiling Apache;
8190 is just the default.  Check the online docs for LimitRequestLine at
httpd.apache.org.




"Bryan White" <bryan%arcamax.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on 06/25/2001 02:59:30
PM

To:   "Frank Hilliard" <frankhilliard%home.com@interlock.lexmark.com>,
      "psql-general" <pgsql-general%postgresql.org@interlock.lexmark.com>
cc:    (bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject:  Re: [GENERAL] It's Apache, not PostgreSQL


> It looks as if Apache has an HTTP input buffer limit of 8190 bytes which
> can be
> reduced with a "LimitRequestLine" directive, but not increased. I'm
> hitting this with
> both phpPgAdmin and Cold Fusion.

That sounds like a limit on the "GET" http request.  Can you recode your
form to use POST?  My guess is it does not have the same limit.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos"
Date:
Subject: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL