Tom Lane writes:
> That's a valid complaint against CVS-log-based notes, since most people
> probably don't have or know how to use tools like cvs2cl. I don't see
> why it's an argument against my idea of a dedicated text file, though.
> Such a file would be just as readily found as release.sgml, possibly
> more so.
Do you have a suggestion for a name and where to put the file. Will it be
removed or cleared before releases?
> I am still concerned about the prospect of either release.sgml or
> a dedicated file becoming commit bottlenecks because everyone is
> constantly hitting them (and in approximately the same place, too).
There are lots of and big projects that use GNU-style ChangeLogs.
Theoretically, they would all hit at the same place, but in practice this
is never a problem. When an outsider submits a patch he just puts the
changelog entry into a separate attachment or right into the message and
the committer puts it into the right place.
We can make this to work as well. If someone comes along, "hey, I just
added a --foo option to pg_bar to do xyx", the patch committer simply adds
a line "added --foo option to pg_bar to do xyz" to the log. All the
release note items are one-liners, so this can't be too big of a deal.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
