Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Subject Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id CAKcux6nQB7J=ya8mJJiT2BX5nHWEaym+u97P6oJkf02P=dVXiA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
Great.  Committed 0001.  Are you planning any further testing of this
patch series?

Sorry I missed the mail. 
Yes, I have further tested patches and find no more issues.

Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: inserts into partitioned table may cause crash