Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZpQUsHRi_y+CHMwfqFhb6ZuW-47L+S=S5K349PxUDr5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> New patches attached, fixing all 3 of the issues you reported:
>
> Thanks. new patches applied cleanly on head and fixing all reported issue.

Great.  Committed 0001.  Are you planning any further testing of this
patch series?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL