Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY2zRRPtf6wk0WFfKa0+FnmfBKor_c=QcTGcKoyM_jQKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Great.  Committed 0001.  Are you planning any further testing of this
>> patch series?
>
> Sorry I missed the mail.
> Yes, I have further tested patches and find no more issues.

OK, thanks to both you and Ashutosh Bapat.  Committed 0002 and 0003.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: configure's checks for --enable-tap-tests are insufficient
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with Error Messages wrt Domains, Checks