Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZaj2qXr3RN9-Q1VH2-sEFXkTySDrAaUMXQLwLKaPisqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
> <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Great.  Committed 0001.  Are you planning any further testing of this
>>> patch series?
>>
>> Sorry I missed the mail.
>> Yes, I have further tested patches and find no more issues.
>
> OK, thanks to both you and Ashutosh Bapat.  Committed 0002 and 0003.

And now committed 0004.  This area could use significantly more work,
but I think it's better to have this much than not.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code