Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwE1TcWm1-4TyZKETa6sRc0YOZJ0BQ8TVDT2cJg46yP4GA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]  (Emanuel Calvo <emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
<emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
> output for the "events" parameter.
>
> But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
>
> { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
>
> or
>
>     INSERT
>     UPDATE
>     DELETE
>     SELECT
> - --
>
>
> I attach a patch for each one.

Though I'm not sure the right policy of the format in synopsis, ISTM that
the following format is suitable in this case, i.e., if the value list
is very simple.
Patch attached.

    SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Global flag
Next
From: Swapnil Bhoite
Date:
Subject: Command line argument for Server