Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
Date
Msg-id 20140422215454.GG10046@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:51:07PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
> <emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
> > output for the "events" parameter.
> >
> > But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
> >
> > { INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
> >
> > or
> >
> >     INSERT
> >     UPDATE
> >     DELETE
> >     SELECT
> > - --
> >
> >
> > I attach a patch for each one.
> 
> Though I'm not sure the right policy of the format in synopsis, ISTM that
> the following format is suitable in this case, i.e., if the value list
> is very simple.
> Patch attached.
> 
>     SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE

Patch applied.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Patch FORCE_NULL option for copy COPY in CSV mode
Next
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD