Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emanuel Calvo
Subject Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]
Date
Msg-id 532C6111.4040102@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Patch for CREATE RULE sgml -- Was in: [DOCS]  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



Hi guys,

I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
output for the "events" parameter.

But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:

{ INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}

or

    INSERT
    UPDATE
    DELETE
    SELECT
- --


I attach a patch for each one.

I sent a mail to pgsql-docs but no response has been received.

Thanks and regards,


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=UWLa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] What should we do for reliable WAL archiving?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To: