On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnakangas@vmware.com) wrote:
>> So if you want to be kind to readers, look at the patch and choose
>> the format depending on which one makes it look better. But there's
>> no need to make a point of it when someone posts in "wrong" format.
>
> To be more precise- my main complaint about this is that this patch is
> making changes to multi-line comments and to documentation, both of
> which get very annoying to try and read in uniform diff format.
> Patches that don't do one or the other of those are likely incomplete
> anyway.
>
> As another point, it's also the very first thing that we document in
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to check for.
TBH, that wiki link seems to suggest that *having context* is the
point of the requirement (to be able to merge with fuzz).
Both unified and context formats have context.
