On 02/24/2013 12:39 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnakangas@vmware.com) wrote:
>>> So if you want to be kind to readers, look at the patch and choose
>>> the format depending on which one makes it look better. But there's
>>> no need to make a point of it when someone posts in "wrong" format.
>> To be more precise- my main complaint about this is that this patch is
>> making changes to multi-line comments and to documentation, both of
>> which get very annoying to try and read in uniform diff format.
>> Patches that don't do one or the other of those are likely incomplete
>> anyway.
>>
>> As another point, it's also the very first thing that we document in
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to check for.
>
> TBH, that wiki link seems to suggest that *having context* is the
> point of the requirement (to be able to merge with fuzz).
>
> Both unified and context formats have context.
>
No, you're missing the point. Some people find reading context diffs
much easier than reading unified diffs. That's why context diffs are the
project's stated preference.
cheers
andrew
