Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)
Date
Msg-id 20130224213144.GL16142@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)
List pgsql-hackers
* Claudio Freire (klaussfreire@gmail.com) wrote:
> > As another point, it's also the very first thing that we document in
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to check for.
>
> TBH, that wiki link seems to suggest that *having context* is the
> point of the requirement (to be able to merge with fuzz).

The PG wiki link states "Is the patch in context diff format?" and
provides a link to the wikipedia article about *that specific format*.
There's absolutely zero confusion over what "context diff format" means.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Show type in psql SELECT