Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsFi3E5hxC20M6RznzP-wGWNBr8R9YEgGz9-L_etffXnJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for
> > this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel
> > vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea?
> >
>
> No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to
> write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and
> push.

I set this "committed" in the CF app.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c