Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KBKtaJRWTi0Od_DEHP5D4mUd_ZOiF7U-ceZkkeRW52Bw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 1:06 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for
> this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel
> vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea?
>

No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to
write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and
push.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE PUBLICATION should "See Also" CREATE SUBSCRIPTION