Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYzpgPNyfqw7Y288mqT6eiQwhA_R36dN-mLLwb88BGU7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:48 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's more consistent if we change it to one side. I prefer "dead items".

I feel like "items" is quite a generic word, so I think I would prefer
TIDs. But it's probably not a big deal.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Brindle
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing