Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+Y_9dgp8ZtadUb53FtOLsk3BZPRJSYcmmkcSqT_yYG_Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:46 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for
> > > this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel
> > > vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea?
> > >
> >
> > No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to
> > write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and
> > push.
>
> I set this "committed" in the CF app.
>

Thanks!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication