Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=11X-9xyPAt6BHCKR2n9TGZ0C=kL8DFdE3+xdtf-GoV+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2018-03-21 23:10:27 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Next up, I have an arm64 system running Debian 9.4.  It bombs in
>> "make check" and in simple tests:
>
> Any chance you could try w/ LLVM 6?  It looks like some parts of ORC
> only got aarch64 in LLVM 6.  I didn't *think* those were necessary, but
> given the backtrace it looks like that still might be relevant.

Hmm.  There is no LLVM 6 in backports.  I'll have to build it, which
I'm happy to do if I can wrap my brain around its cmake build system
(or for you to build it if you want), but it may take... who knows, a
day? on this little thing.

If that turns out to be it I guess we'd need to figure out how to
detect an LLVM with bits missing hand handle it more gracefully?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2