On 2018-03-22 10:50:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2018-03-21 23:10:27 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> Next up, I have an arm64 system running Debian 9.4. It bombs in
> >> "make check" and in simple tests:
> >
> > Any chance you could try w/ LLVM 6? It looks like some parts of ORC
> > only got aarch64 in LLVM 6. I didn't *think* those were necessary, but
> > given the backtrace it looks like that still might be relevant.
>
> Hmm. There is no LLVM 6 in backports.
I think there now is:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=llvm&searchon=names§ion=all&suite=stretch-backports
Package llvm-6.0-dev
stretch-backports (devel): Modular compiler and toolchain technologies, libraries and headers
1:6.0-1~bpo9+1: amd64
It's a recent addition:
llvm-toolchain-6.0 (1:6.0-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
* Team upload
* Rebuild for stretch-backports.
-- Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:58:43 +0100
Otherwise I think LLVM has a repo with the necessary bits:
http://apt.llvm.org/
But if it's not this, I think we're going to have to indeed build
LLVM. Without proper debugging symbols it's going to be hard to figure
this out otherwise.
FWIW, I build it with:
mkdir -p ~/build/llvm/debug/vpath
cd ~/build/llvm/debug/vpath
cmake -G Ninja ~/src/llvm/ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/andres/build/llvm/debug/install -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=true
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD='X86;BPF'-DLLVM_CCACHE_BUILD=true
ninja -j8 install
I suspect you'd need to replace X86 with AArch64 (BPF isn't needed,
that's for stuff unrelated to PG).
> If that turns out to be it I guess we'd need to figure out how to
> detect an LLVM with bits missing hand handle it more gracefully?
Yea :/.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
