Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=02qmL19tRD78KDj8q5Mfcp6M1wVjSwpOdgana_VNfGRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2018-03-21 23:10:27 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>> Next up, I have an arm64 system running Debian 9.4.  It bombs in
>>> "make check" and in simple tests:
>>
>> Any chance you could try w/ LLVM 6?  It looks like some parts of ORC
>> only got aarch64 in LLVM 6.  I didn't *think* those were necessary, but
>> given the backtrace it looks like that still might be relevant.
>
> Hmm.  There is no LLVM 6 in backports.  I'll have to build it, which
> I'm happy to do if I can wrap my brain around its cmake build system
> (or for you to build it if you want), but it may take... who knows, a
> day? on this little thing.

Actually scratch that, I'll just install buster.  More soon.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping