Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Krunal Bauskar
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id CAB10pyb_-mhUwWG0XFZUVVuGjUWikQ5p=CSut=CBQVfQgCXMaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 10:50, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00:50AM +0530, Krunal Bauskar wrote:
>> (Thanks to Amit Khandekar for rigorously performance testing this patch
>> with different combinations).

> For the simple-update and tpcb-like graphs, do you have any actual
> numbers to share between 128 and 1024 connections?

Also, exactly what hardware/software platform were these curves
obtained on?

Hardware: ARM Kunpeng 920 BareMetal Server 2.6 GHz. 64 cores (56 cores for server and 8 for client) [2 numa nodes]
Storage: 3.2 TB NVMe SSD
OS: CentOS Linux release 7.6
PGSQL: baseline = Release Tag 13.1

 
                        regards, tom lane


--
Regards,
Krunal Bauskar

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: [doc] plan invalidation when statistics are update