Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id 592969.1606368032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00:50AM +0530, Krunal Bauskar wrote:
>> (Thanks to Amit Khandekar for rigorously performance testing this patch
>> with different combinations).

> For the simple-update and tpcb-like graphs, do you have any actual
> numbers to share between 128 and 1024 connections?

Also, exactly what hardware/software platform were these curves
obtained on?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Krunal Bauskar
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Next
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist