Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id X783xxbOWZ5YqWDr@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com>)
Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00:50AM +0530, Krunal Bauskar wrote:
> (Thanks to Amit Khandekar for rigorously performance testing this patch
>  with different combinations).

For the simple-update and tpcb-like graphs, do you have any actual
numbers to share between 128 and 1024 connections?  The blue lines
look like they are missing some measurements in-between, so it is hard
to tell if this is an actual improvement or just some lack of data.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC: custom signal handler for extensions
Next
From: Krunal Bauskar
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.