Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaxXbzLSmJeH9zw9cBN0u7BoyuLFOyy5t1BDVganBCy5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size  (Markus Nullmeier <dq124@uni-heidelberg.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Either the comment is wrongly written or the check for overflow
>> condition has to be fixed. Assuming the overflow check condition to be
>> erroneous, I've attached a patch to fix this.
>
> Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving RLS planning
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes