Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Nullmeier
Subject Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id 38e14b52-94f1-756b-8970-1ae8d428eb1a@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/08/16 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've attached a patch to fix this.
>> Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.
> Committed.

Hmm, somehow this fix (60379f66c8 for master) does not seem to appear
in the 9.5 and 9.6 branches, yet the latter both include commit 88e9823.


-- 
Markus Nullmeier            http://www.g-vo.org
German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?