Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRxaf_7uNckNTn58kto1U8pk72nunW+G5C-RqT43p0+8w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Either the comment is wrongly written or the check for overflow
> condition has to be fixed. Assuming the overflow check condition to be
> erroneous, I've attached a patch to fix this.

Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled