Re: Database Performance? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Berger
Subject Re: Database Performance?
Date
Msg-id A9255F60-23F8-11D6-AF47-000502B354E1@vtiscan.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Database Performance?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Database Performance?
Re: Database Performance?
Re: Database Performance?
List pgsql-general
This argument is out of date. MySQL currently supports
transactions, foreign
keys, and outer joins. (4.1 will support subselects)

As for fault tolerance, MySQL has built in support for replication.

A couple years ago I converted a project from MySQL to PostgreSQL
because
of MySQL's lack of features. I am now in the process of converting
back to
MySQL because of the performance improvements and replication.


>
> Be a little bit careful about benchmarks. Whether postgresql or
> mysql is
> faster depends on what you're doing. If all you want to do is the
> occasional
> insert and lots and lots of simple selects, mysql (or even grep)
> will beat
> postgres. If you want to do subselects, transactions, foreign
> keys, outer
> joins, fault tolerence or anything else that makes a database a
> database,
> mysql just can't do it.
>
> See if MySQL and PostgreSQL satisfy your business requirements and then
> decide which one you want.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Kym Farnik"
Date:
Subject: Re: Question: Who's Using Postgres
Next
From: Andrew Snow
Date:
Subject: Re: Database Performance?