Re: data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From George Neuner
Subject Re: data-checksums
Date
Msg-id 9q6a5d18j7llrp0pt3oq6orb0vugrio9o2@4ax.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to data-checksums  ("Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>)
List pgsql-general
"On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:02:37 +0100, "Rakesh Kumar"
<rakeshkumar464@mail.com> wrote:

>Hello Mr. Pedantic,
>
>> noticeable != huge.
>
>and noticeable != small/negligible either, at least from English
>point of view.

small != negligible. <grin>

The word "noticable" does not imply any particular magnitude of event.
It means only that <something> can be observed.

There is no canon technical usage.  In layman's use, "noticable" often
*does* imply that an effect is small, and that one might not see it if
not looking specifically for it.


Unfortunately, English is a slippery language.  Perhaps technical
documents should be written in Sumerian.

YMMV,
George



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Moises Lima dos Anjos
Date:
Subject: Hi i like to unscribe me, sorry for the incovenient.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums