Re: data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: data-checksums
Date
Msg-id 20180109202259.cpszfiavep42pp6v@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: data-checksums  ("Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>)
Responses Re: data-checksums  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2018-01-09 20:04:04 +0100, Rakesh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > > I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG
> > > official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes
> > > difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)
> > 
> > Why believe, when you can measure?
> 
> yup doing that.  But I still feel that PG documentation should stay
> away from such scare mongering.  Or did the lawyers write that :)

So we should rather lie about it having a potential for performance
impact? Who'd be helped by that?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: George Neuner
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums