Re: data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rakesh Kumar
Subject Re: data-checksums
Date
Msg-id trinity-6e592d6e-7902-4df2-8806-95914ae94d12-1515524644593@3c-app-mailcom-lxa04
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: data-checksums  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: data-checksums
List pgsql-general
> > I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG
> > official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes
> > difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)
> 
> Why believe, when you can measure?

yup doing that.  But I still feel that PG documentation should stay away from such scare mongering.  Or did the lawyers
writethat :)
 


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Rakesh Kumar"
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums