Re: data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: data-checksums
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1y=ioKs+cy_WRCNvh-4a3fVvM0ZiVa6jjbySQbXLKL1iQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: data-checksums  ("Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>)
Responses Hi i like to unscribe me, sorry for the incovenient.  (Moises Lima dos Anjos <mozart08@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@mail.com> wrote:

> That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums
> is well worth it.

I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)


Why ask us questions if you won't believe our answers?

Noticeable means it probably isn't important for most real-world cases, but if you work at it you can probably detect it.

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Rakesh Kumar"
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Next
From: Agnar Renolen
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting started with first user.