Re: data-checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rakesh Kumar
Subject Re: data-checksums
Date
Msg-id trinity-9ae7ee48-40c7-4820-ac76-c53e606435ab-1515520721430@3c-app-mailcom-lxa16
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: data-checksums  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: data-checksums  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: data-checksums  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Re: data-checksums  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
> That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums
> is well worth it.

I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG official document writes "noticeable performance
penalty",it becomes difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)
 


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: data-checksums