Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id 959c0d0f40df530f1c265dd70ee95a3c11e63602.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> 
> > > I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
> > > mark it as "returned with feedback".
> > 
> > I have to agree given the time left.
> 
> This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies.  I propose that we
> mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?

+1.  That requires more thought.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug fix for tab completion of ALTER TABLE ... VALIDATE CONSTRAINT ...