Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id 00CD585F-EA5C-422C-8765-F5BCCBB43147@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:

>> I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
>> mark it as "returned with feedback".
>
> I have to agree given the time left.

This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies.  I propose that we
mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages