Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFnAwNCO0ty4+NZDq_k2RTZEjZ7Wd5FWJvkT7za05KnmQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 3:10 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
> > > mark it as "returned with feedback".
> >
> > I have to agree given the time left.
>
> This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies.  I propose that we
> mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?

+1.  That requires more thought.

Yes, I think so too.
--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target