Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id 49CD74A4-2592-432D-9F19-7581345D2864@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 4 Sep 2021, at 01:17, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 3:10 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>> wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> > This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies.  I propose that we
> > mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?
>
> +1.  That requires more thought.
>
> Yes, I think so too.

Done that way, it can always be resubmitted in a later CF.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace