Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back
Date
Msg-id 202109031756.d6li4szj5zje@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Set the volatility of the timestamptz version of date_bin() back  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:46 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Sep-03, John Naylor wrote:
> > These catversion bumps in branch 14 this late in the cycle seem suspect.
> > Didn't we have some hesitation to push multirange unnest around beta2
> > precisely because of a desire to avoid catversion bumps?
> 
> This was for correcting a mistake (although the first commit turned out to
> be a mistake itself), so I understood it to be necessary.

A crazy idea might have been to return to the original value.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers