Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
Date
Msg-id 72116b2a-ba49-06bf-00eb-07bf7a06a008@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/03/09 11:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2017/03/08 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Only regular tables are tested as valid objects. Testing toast tables
>>> is not worth the complication. Could you add as well a matview?
>>
>> Done in the attached updated patch.
> 
> +select count(*) > 0 from pg_visibility('matview');
> + ?column?
> +----------
> + f
> +(1 row)
> That's quite a generic name :) You may want to use less common names
> in your tests.

I agree.  Updated patch attached.

> 
> OK, I am marking that as ready for committer.

Thanks.

Regards,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge