Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
Date
Msg-id 20170309132538.GC9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit, Michael,

* Amit Langote (Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote:
> On 2017/03/09 11:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Langote
> > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> On 2017/03/08 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> Only regular tables are tested as valid objects. Testing toast tables
> >>> is not worth the complication. Could you add as well a matview?
> >>
> >> Done in the attached updated patch.
> >
> > +select count(*) > 0 from pg_visibility('matview');
> > + ?column?
> > +----------
> > + f
> > +(1 row)
> > That's quite a generic name :) You may want to use less common names
> > in your tests.
>
> I agree.  Updated patch attached.
>
> > OK, I am marking that as ready for committer.

I'm starting to look over this, seems pretty straight-forward.

Barring issues, I should get it committed in probably an hour or two.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Artur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enabling replication connections by default inpg_hba.conf